- #Lightroom vs adobe bridge pro#
- #Lightroom vs adobe bridge code#
- #Lightroom vs adobe bridge download#
#Lightroom vs adobe bridge code#
The Camera Raw plug-in code isn’t even stored in the same folder as the Bridge application.) (Because it’s really a separate application. And Lightroom Classic remembers the History for each image.īut in Bridge, almost no Bridge features can be used while you are in Camera Raw, because the separate Camera Raw window blocks almost all access to the rest of Bridge. By requiring that Camera Raw be opened into its own modal window, this restricts what it can do, and it also restricts what you can do in Bridge while Camera Raw is open.įor example, in Lightroom Classic, it is no problem to freely switch between raw edits, metadata edits, and other tasks such as printing and slide shows, because they are all integrated modules in the same application. But it is not as well integrated as in the Develop module in Lightroom Classic, and this creates a number of problems. The big problem with Camera Raw is that it’s a modal dialog box. By Camera Raw can launch from Bridge so you can say it’s “within” it in a way. It can be as seamless as editing a picture within Lightroom. Anyway, when editing anything within Bridge, it does not have to open or launch a separate application. Actually Camera Raw engine is not different from Lightroom's editing engine. Camera Raw acts like a native engine within Bridge. Without Photo Downloader, Bridge cannot automate the first ingestion step in an end-to-end workflow all Bridge can do then is show a folder of photos from a camera.Ģ. In Bridge those functions are available only inside Photo Downloader, so if you don’t include that, then when comparing end-to-end workflows, Bridge no longer has feature parity with the Import dialog box in Lightroom. This automated ingestion saves a lot of time and work. By Lightroom Classic many people (including myself) use Import to pre-process images with features such as applying a metadata template, automatic organization into date-based folders, automatic template-based file renaming, and import presets.
#Lightroom vs adobe bridge download#
You can download the pictures to your computer any which way, Bridge will still be able to show all the downloaded pictures, heck, it can show pictures that are not only downloaded to your computer, but also pictures on a thumb drive without any need for import into a certain database.
There are differences between Bridge and Lightroom, but I would not consider "4 applications" vs "1 application" as a difference between them.ġ. Adobe photo downloader is not necessary. You can download the pictures to your computer any which way, Bridge will still be able to show all the downloaded pictures, heck, it can show pictures that are not only downloaded to your computer, but also pictures on a thumb drive without any need for import into a certain database.Ģ. You get to choose.ġ. Adobe photo downloader is not necessary. It’s largely a personal opinion, because you’ll just as easily find people who love Bridge and can’t stand Lightroom Classic.
#Lightroom vs adobe bridge pro#
Bridge is also better if the files you work with extend far beyond the scope of just photographic images, because Bridge also works with vector graphics from Adobe Illustrator, video files and motion graphics from Adobe Premiere Pro and Adobe After Effects, layout files from Adobe InDesign, web graphics, fonts…īut in a pure photographic workflow, Bridge slows me down too much. In contrast, the workflow with Bridge requires four separate applications to achieve the same workflow: Adobe Photo Downloader for direct import from camera/card to Bridge, Adobe Bridge for organization and metadata, Camera Raw for raw editing, and Adobe Photoshop for printing.īridge is better if you prefer to use a pure file browser rather than a catalog based on a database.
In Lightroom Classic it’s all in one application from import to print.
There are more options, more keyboard shortcuts for those options, better support for multiple displays, etc. Although most of the raw and metadata batch editing I want to do is possible with Camera Raw and Bridge, in Lightroom Classic the same tasks are faster and more efficient once you learn the tools.
0 kommentar(er)
